Search:
Members Area
Energy Efficiency in Buildings
Sustainable Construction
Mineral Wool
Regulatory
Eurima
Resources
Story
Resources
/
Facts & Figures
Publications
Events & Conferences
Calculation Tools
Lexicon
Facts & Figures
U-values in Europe
Media Centre
Links
Facts & Figures
The graphs below cannot be used without quoting "Ecofys studies for Eurima" as the source.
Cost Analysis of effects of the EPB Directive and possible extensions in 2010
Living areas of climate zones and house-types (EU-15 building stock 2002)
U-values for better energy performance buildings | WALL, Average building regulations (INDICATIVE)
U-values for better energy performance buildings | WALL, WEO 2006 price scenario
U-values for better energy performance buildings | WALL, Peak price scenario
U-values for better energy performance buildings | ROOF, Average buildings regulation (INDICATIVE)
U-values for better energy performance buildings | ROOF, WEO 2006 price scenario
U-values for better energy performance buildings | ROOF, Peak price scenario
U-values for better energy performance buildings | FLOOR, Average building regulations (INDICATIVE)
U-values for better energy performance buildings | FLOOR, WEO 2006 price scenario
U-values for better energy performance buildings | FLOOR, Peak price scenario
Definition of economic optimum
Position of the economic optimum
Non-linear investment costs (1)
Non-linear investment costs (2)
European heating degree days map (EUROSTAT method)
European cooling degree days map (ASHRAE method)
Energy demand for cooling for a SFH in Seville, Marseille and Lyon
Energy demand for cooling for a MFH in Seville, Marseille and Lyon
Recommended U-values cost efficiency for walls, WEO reference
Recommended U-values cost efficiency for roofs, WEO reference
Recommended U-values cost efficiency for floors, WEO reference
Fuel mix development PRIMES-scenario for EU25
U-values for floors according to different Post-Kyoto targets
U-values for walls according to different Post-Kyoto targets
U-values for roofs according to different Post-Kyoto targets
Results cost efficiency and Post-Kyoto (85% savings) for Stockholm
Results cost efficiency and Post-Kyoto (85% savings) for Amsterdam
Results cost efficiency and Post-Kyoto (85% savings) for Seville
Results cost efficiency and Post-Kyoto (85% savings) for Warsaw